'Analyzing the legalization of drugs\r'

'Introduction\r\nThe accession in the do do drugss cases during the years has chip in some(prenominal) propositions from various individuals, maven of which is the legalization of drugs. Since the widespread custom of culpable drugs has howevertu ally persisted throughout the expanse of time, and with the blow to contain the issue of black-market drug use, one suggested solution is to amend the law by legalizing the use of drugs or by putting it eventually beneath the mince and mandate of the law.\r\nHowever, the juridical system has had to recognize with the situation. The need to reexamine the vivacious methods of managing and handling these drug cases proportionally rose with the persistence of illegal drugs amidst existing legal sanctions. This had led to the processing of drug cases not however in court but even outside the court. This is to cope with the great number of drug offenders of varying levels getting apprehended everyday.\r\nThere were several(prenom inal) judicial st sendgies conceived in order to deal with the broad amount of drug cases. These judicial strategies include the concept of specialized divisions of a drug court in some trial courts, sped-up case processing procedures, deferred criminal prosecution programs requiring court-supervised treatment and counseling and more. There are overly combinations of these strategies, all to speed-up the processing of these cases. These cases are screened beforehand in order to know what horizontal surface and what level of judicial supervisions would be applicable for the case. This is in any case essential for first treatment intervention and rehabilitation of the offenders, so as to stop the continued drug abuse and the desireliness of crimes.\r\nOn the other hand, arguments for the legalization of drugs are perpetually existence hurled forward in order to finally resolve the existing contentions against the ill- effectuate of drugs as well as for the perceived benefits both the regimen and the individuals dope really obtain from legalizing these contents.\r\nArguments for the legalization of drugs\r\nOne of the close harsh drugs in the society today is hemp. It is known scientifically as the hemp specify, Cannabis sativa, where the leaves are being dried up, rolled into sheets of paper and be ingest just like cigarette or tobacco. It is the close often used illegal drug in the world, known in various names all over, like â€Å"pot,” â€Å"herb,” and â€Å"Mary Jane.” any(prenominal) users can cod use of hemp by mixing it into solid food substances or drink it by brewing it with tea. The addictive element of ganja is its Tetrahydrocannabinol or tetrahydrocannabinol content. The effect of marijuana would depend on how upstanding or how potent is its Tetrahydrocannabinol content, thus besides giving various effect on the marijuana users (Dell and Snyder 630).\r\nOne of the reasons for finally legalizing drug s, especially marijuana, is founded on the historic context of the â€Å"illegal” substance. In America, for instance, those who lived in the country of Jamestown back in 1611 raised marijuana downstairs the order of King James I for the use of goods and services of crafting rope for the naval force of the British. The â€Å"herb”, as it has been called, also served as a medicinal substance specifically for George Washington who planted marijuana in spite of appearance the premises of Mount Vernon and that the plant was categorized as a prescription medicine until 1937 (Smith 101).\r\nMarijuana also has arbitrary sides which can be used as an argument for its eventual legalization. One of the beneficial effects of the use of marijuana rests on its utility for the control of symptoms, especially in chemotherapy procedures, as an â€Å"effective antiemetic” among patients with health profiles such as cancer and â€Å"acquired immune deficiency syndrome patie nts with wasting syndrome” which led to â€Å"a greater mightiness to cope emotionally with disabling or sedate illness (Gorman 23).\r\nMoreover, under the rule of Emperor subgenus Chen Nung of ancient China five centuries ago, marijuana has been state as well as a plant that has medicinal value in shapes of hardening malaria, rheumatism, constipation, â€Å"absentmindedness” as well as the claims for mental and natural disorders suffered by women (Grinspoon and Bakalar 3).\r\nThere is also the contention for the panorama of establishing a regulated drug market which can be a profitable source of government tax. This idea illustrates the observation that the widespread use of illegal drugs and its potential to be a market goodness can overcome the legal restrictions ascribed unto it.  A controlled degree of the regulation of marijuana, for example, creates, instead, an increase in government revenues that may outweigh or, at least, come close to the effect ive government payments on law enforcement against the production, distribution and inspiration of marijuana (Caputo and Ostrom 475).\r\nRefutations\r\nDrug Abuse is one of the most common criminal cases in the society today. It is a form of substance abuse, just like alcoholism, since these outlaw(a) drugs are truly addictive in nature. Because of this, umteen people who are hooked on drugs cannot slowly let go of the dependence, and would often lead to drug-related crimes like robbery, physical assault, or even murder. Not only does these drugs dangerous to others, but it is also harmful in the drug users’ body, causing the body to take into disconfirming turns, like deterioration and organ failures.\r\nWhen a soulfulness smokes or inhales marijuana smoke, he would usually tone rapid heart beats, loss of coordination and decreased mind of balance, slow reaction rate and a dry mouth. These are already signs of marijuana intoxication, along with the involution of bloo d vessels in the eye, that’s why marijuana users usually admit red eyes. The effects of marijuana would usually last two to three hours, where the marijuana user would usually tend to be sleepy. The disconfirming effects of using marijuana would be hindering the user’s short-change term memory, wherein it would be difficult for him to remember recent events. This would usually lead to car crashes and other accidents, since their sense of coordination is greatly affected.\r\n some other dangerous drug would be cocaine. This drug’s effect on the body is really minus, where addiction to cocaine could bring about permanent return in one’s body or even death. Cocaine has both short term and long term effects. The short term effects are immediately noticeable, but not that damaging as compared to the long term ones. The common short term effects are a tang of boosted energy, a decrease in a soul’s appetite, and a rather hyped heart rate and blood pressure.\r\nThere are still many other types of illegal drugs and similar forms of substances that create ill-effects to the boilersuit health of individuals, much resulting for them to commit crimes that they could not have possibly committed had they not interpreted these illegal substances.\r\nConclusion\r\nAlthough several illegal substances can actually bring forth benefits for individuals, the negative consequences outweigh these positive sides. Further, not all of these substances have positive effects when used, and that the negative consequences of illegal drug use oftentimes lead to crimes and violence. For these reasons along with the refutations against the legalization of drugs, it can be asserted that the legalization of drugs should not be interpreted as the ultimate measure for solving illegal drug issues. Rather, the reasons behind the legalization of drugs should be taken as a means in decision the deeper refutations against it.\r\nReferences\r\nCaputo, M. R., a nd B. J. Ostrom. â€Å"Potential Tax taxation from a set Marijuana Market: A Meaningful Revenue Source.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53.4 (1994): 475-90.\r\nCocaine-Effects.com. â€Å"Cocaine Effects.” 2001.\r\nDell, D. D., and J. A. Snyder. â€Å"Marijuana: Pro and Con.” The American Journal of Nursing 77.4 (1977): 630.\r\nGorman, M. â€Å" core Abuse.” The American Journal of Nursing 97.11 (1997): 23.\r\nGrinspoon, L., and J. B. Bakalar. â€Å"The History of Cannabis.”  Marihuana, the veto Medicine. London: Yale University Press, 1997. 3.\r\nSmith, G. R. W. â€Å"Possession of Marijuana in San Mateo County: Some Social Costs of Criminalization.” Stanford Law Review 22.1 (1969): 101.\r\n \r\n'