.

Saturday, March 30, 2019

Effects of Transition on Child Stress

Effects of Transition on Child StressUsing evidence, write an es say showing how focussing is influenced at the levels of the individual, family, locality and society. Chose one(a) interpolation at one of the levels and say why you think it could be effective in tackling the problem.This prove looks at how r individually is influenced at many levels individual, family, locality and society, and c formerlyntrates on the level of family, to hunt an hitch that could be effective in tackling the problem. As Finlay et al. (2005 p. 141), hear is several(prenominal)thing that e actuallybody experiences at any(prenominal) point in their spiritedness, from babyren to adults, although excessive amounts of underline arse be harmful for individuals in terms of their health and longevity. It is therefore authorised that the causes of long-run stress be identified and that interventions atomic number 18 utilized in mark to minimize the adverse effectuate of this stress. As Fin lay et al. (2005 p. 29-31) point out, however, stress squirt strike many causes, from individual factors, to family concerns, to external factors from the individuals environment (locality) to societal-level factors, all of which dismiss lead to an individual experiencing stress. This can make it trying to isolate one intervention that could be effective the remainder of the essay will, however, describe a case study and will highlight one intervention that might be effective in this case.The particular eccentric that will be used is that of a primary-aged claw who is showing signs of stress. The chela is manifesting behavioural changes, such as disturbed sleep and mood swings, and is experiencing headaches and impairment of appetite, all of which atomic number 18 classic signs of childhood stress (Flinn, 1999). The child is the youngest child of a two-child family, and has just started primary school. His parents both elaborate full- beat and they are rarely in the house . The family does not eat together. The childs senior brother is a teenager, and is going through exams at the moment. He himself is in addition showing signs of stress, and all the spare time the parents choose, they spend with their oldest child, helping him fuck with his exams. It is clear that the youngest child is being neglected emotionally, at a time when he needs support, having just moved to full-time school. There are many stressors on this child, which can be addressed through some simple interventions, which will be discussed below.A recent study (Turner-Cobb, 2008) shows that, in particular, periods of innovation in childhood can be extremely trying for children. Studies have suggested that stress can be anticipated by children, which can lead to deep anxiety ( native Report, 2007). As shown by Flinn (1999), untreated stress in childhood can have long-term health effects, such as adverse developmental effects (McEwen, 2008) and increased mortality (McEwen, 2003). In addition, childhood stress can lead to social problems, such as poor familial relationships, and behavioural disorders as a result of this (McEwen, 2003 Alfven et al., 2008 Flinn, 1995). As Flinn and England (1997) show, supported by Bauer and Boyce (2004), these social problems can then lead, in later on bearing, to socio-economic problems caused by long-term health concerns.As (Finlay et al., 2005 p.64) state, Family relationships have both a positive and a negative effect on health behaviours and health. As suggested, the lack of family meals, where the whole family sits down to eat can crack the parent-children relationship, and can lead to stress being put on the children, who find out they do not have a regular point of progress to with their parent(s), breaking the facility for communication with their parent(s) (Finlay et al., 2005 p.64). This certainly seems to be the case here, where the parents work full-time and have little spare time to spend choice time with their child. As (Finlay et al., 2005 p.70) suggest, the changing roles within families have put stress on the family, with both parents working meaning that the children are slight potential to see their parents for extended periods of time, leading to a greater need for independency at an earlier age and, in any case, potentially leading to poor health behaviours in the children and to higher levels of stress in these children.What can be done, what intervention can be suggested, to help this child? Given that the child is young, very young, and is going through a stressful period in his life at the moment, with the transition to full-time school, and that the child is being neglected, emotionally, by his parents, the suggested intervention is that the family attempt to sit down together at all mealtimes. This would yield the family an opportunity to be together and would allow the child time to mold down with his parents and to feel comfortable enough to be able to verbalize them about his worries and his concerns. As shown by Arnold (1990), it is often enough for a child to be given the lieu to talk for the child to feel less stressed, and to recover from the symptoms of stress they were suffering.This intervention is expected to be effective in that it would allow connections to be made again between the child and his parents, and his brother, allowing some repair of the disrupted parent-child relationship (Finlay et al., 2005 p. 64). The need for families to have a space (both physical and temporal) where they can be together is paramount, in terms of allowing each family member to interact with each other, allowing them to discuss their worries and concerns and allowing, to some extent, the stressors to be relaxed. This is in particular important for a young child who needs to feel protected. Without the surety of their families, their parents, young children can begin to feel vulnerable, with this vulnerability allowing for stressful events to h ave a far greater negative effect than usual on their responses to stress (Arnold, 1990). By sitting down together as a family, by talking and being listened to, the child can externalize his worries and, once shared, these worries can be overcompensatet with in the most appropriate ways. Indeed, recent studies have shown that families who eat meals together have children who are more emotionally flushed than those families who do not eat together (Fivush and Duke, 2005 Duke et al., 2004).In summary, the suggested intervention in this case is to sit down together, as a family, to eat together. It is important to realize that such an intervention can have major effects on the sense of belonging a child has, which, in turn, can reduce their sense of vulnerability and can increase their ability to deal with stressful situations, and to avoid suffering from stress. This type of interaction can also lead to greater levels of family cohesiveness and resilience, having the beneficial sid e effect of alter to a general reduction in family-level stressors.ReferencesAlfven, G. et al. (2008). Stressor, perceived stress and perennial pain in Swedish schoolchildren. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 65(4), pp. 381-387.Arnold, E.L. (1990). childhood Stress. John Wiley Sons.Bauer, A.W. and Boyce, T. (2004) Prophecies of childhood how childrens social environments and biological propensities affect the health of populations. global Journal of Behavioral Medicine 11(3), pp. 164-175.Duke, M.P. et al. (2004). Of ketchup and kin dinnertime conversations as a major source of family knowledge, family adjustment and family resilience. The Emory Centre for Myth and rite in American Life, Working Paper 26, available from http//www.marial.emory.edu/pdfs/Duke_Fivush027-03.pdf Accessed on third October 2008.Finlay, L. et al. (2005). Understanding Health. The Open University.Fivush, R. et al. (2004). Family narratives and the development of childrens emotional well-being. In Family stories and life course, Pratt, M.W. and Fiese, B.H. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Flinn, M.V. (1995). Childhood stress and family environment. Current Anthropology 36(5), pp. 181-187.Flinn, M.V. and England, B. G. (1997). Social economics of childhood glucocorticoid stress response and health. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 102(1), pp. 33-53.Flinn, M.V. (1999). Family environment, stress and health during childhood. In Hormones, Health and Behaviour, Panter-Brick, C. and Worthman, C.M. (eds.), Cambridge University Press.McEwen, B.S. (2003). Early life influences on life-long patterns of behaviour and health. Mental retardent and Developmental Disability Research Review 9(3), pp.149-154.McEwen, B.S. (2008). Understanding the potency of stressful early life experiences on brain and body function. Metabolism 57(2), pp. 11-15.Primary Report (2007). Community Soundings The Primary Review regional witness sessions. obtainable from http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/ pdfs/12_10_2007primary.pdf Accessed on 3rd October 2008.Turner-Cobb, J. (2008). Childrens transition to school. Preliminary results available from http//www.bath.ac.uk/schooltransition/homeresults Accessed 3rd October 2008.

No comments:

Post a Comment