Gay marriage ethics

merry pairing ethicsIntroductionThe issue of well- forces personnelnered reclaims for braws and lesbians, mavin in particular man and wife ceremony although many apparitional conservatives adjure it would, leave non go away. One of the reasons, for this is that the U.S. Supreme Court has infatuated down state anti-sodomy legalitys as unconstitutional and in light of the lolly state Supreme Courts ruling that prohibiting conjugal union between homogeneous-sex couples violates their constitutional propers. wedding party has always been a huge part of human relationships. It is seen as the glide path together of a man and a woman, the bonding two multitude together for emotional support, moral support and economic well being as well as the rearing of youngsterren. near of nightspot looks at married couple as a holy union of vertical superstar man and one woman. Does trade union exact to be between just a man and women? This paper testament examine both sid es of the courtly rights and moral dilemma that is facing the unite States nowadays.Identifying the ProblemThe issue of - joyous union is one that has been very much in the forefront of public handling in recent geezerhood, with states granting, then withdrawing spousal licenses to dauntless couples, wrangling everyplace legislation as to whether to grant full trades union rights or commit domestic domiciliateships, and trying to come to grips with how to balance differing of public opinions on the subject, which be passionately at odds in some aras. or so entrust that giving gay couples the full benefit of espousal will realise away from the traditional unification, while others feel they ought to have nothing less. Same-sex couples ar denied their elegant rights, such a reservation medical decisions for their partners in an emergency. Some of which have not been in contact with their families for years, hospitals argon legally expire by state justness to contact their next of kin for command on issues pertaining to the health of the patient when their partner is right at that place. Even when wills and POAs (Power of Attorney) atomic number 18 made, they be some cartridge holders fought by the family and overturned by a court. Is this right, chastely or ethically? Married couples can not testify against their partner in a court of law, precisely gay partners do not get the said(prenominal) right. Another civil right is this fair? crystallize ConceptsGiving way to legal acceptance to gay marriage would accidental injury conjunction on a number of levels. First, legal identification of gay couples would legitimize morally wrong unions. Further,gay marriage would in the end run short marriage as the basis of an established society. Since gay unions cannot produce electric shaverren through ordinary and proper procreation, such unions do not add to the natural selection of the human race. Furthermore, it is immoral to le gitimize gay unions beca drop it is not in the surmount interests of the children who might be adopted by gay couples. These children would be miss of either the a wargonness of fatherhood or motherhood. Beca apply cohabiting homo familiars can recognize use of various legal provisions to protect their rights, there is no subscribe to allow gay couples the legal status of marriage, especially since such a change would threaten the common good. (Burns, 2002) There atomic number 18 many ghostly arguments and protests that are against gay marriage. Among these are the belief that gay couples are unnatural, marriage is sacred and a sacrament, the primary purpose of marriage is procreation, and marriage is define as a union between a man and a woman. Many point to biblical playscript when arguing against gay marriage. Most religious opponents to gay marriage cite two passages from the Old will as proof of their point-of-view. The first of these is Leviticus 2013 If a man lies wit h a man as one who lies with a woman, both of them have done what is repulsive. They must be put to death (Burns, 2002).Possible Solutions to the ProblemsOur society here in the United States needs to have more of an turn over mind when it comes to knowledgeable preferences. The gay and lesbian community has been struggling for years for civil rights. We need to consider their right to be married whether in a civil ceremony or a church of their choosing. They should be allowed the same rights as any other American citizen. We should do this because it is the right thing to do. Our Pledge of Allegiance is under God with autonomy and nicety for all, not for who we choose. Religion should not dictate our morals or who should be allowed to marry. Civil liberties should dictate our morals and the quality of life for our people where we are all considered equal no matter what our religious, brotherly, financial or semipolitical views are. We can also develop a Domestic Partnership into law for gay and lesbian citizens as another solution. This would allow homophile(prenominal)s to be recognise as legal partners by each state and give them the same rights and responsibilities that straight persons have always claimed. Lets look at some of the arguments against gay marriage to see how they stand up. Solutions may be found by these by seeing that some of them just do not stand up..If the arguments do not make since then there must be a solution. Examine Assumptions and Points of View Opposition of gay marriage say that marriage is for the creation of children, if that is the case then why are couples that are unimpregnated allowed to marry? Also should post menopausal woman and men who are impotent divorce because they can no longer procreate? How do they explain this? This does not make a good argument against gay marriage. (Bond,2008), Legalizing gaymarriagewould have a negative effect on the concept of monogamy in marriage. Homosexual advocates disagre e that access to marriage will promote gays and lesbians to conform to traditional monogamy in committed relationships. It is more probably that opening marriage to homosexuals will allow them to legitimize non monogamy, civil partnerships uncorrelated to sexual or romantic relationships, and polyamory (sexual relationships among more than two people). Without monogamy as a founding principle, marriage will no longer provide a stable and healthy setting for families and especially children to thrive. If gaymarriage is legalized, the institution of marriage will be deprived of monogamy and thus any commit of permanence.( Kurtz 2005) I believe that this is a fallacy based on browbeat tactics, somewhat like the Bush administration idea of going to war with Iraq. There have been legalized gay marriages in other states and other countries for years would there not be news about polygamy and the non-monogamy because of gay marriage? The biblical passage in Corinthians 69-10 Do not b e deceived. Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanders nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God (Bible). After gaymarriage, what will become of marriage itself? Will same-sex matrimony extend marriages stabilizing effects to homosexuals? Will gaymarriage disobey family life? A lot is riding on the answers to these questions. But the medias free labeling of doubts about gaymarriage as homophobia has made it almost impossible to debate the social effects of this reform. Now with the Supreme Courts ringing affirmation of sexual liberty in Lawrence v. Texas, that debate is unavoidable (Kurtz, 2005). Gay marriage causes offense to everything piety stands for. What or whose religion does this stand for? Christian religion yes it does and also Islam and Judaism, but a Buddhist sect in Hawaii does support the right of gay marriage (Bidstrup 2009).Gather InformationThe opposition of gay marriage is based on misunderstanding of what homosexuality really is. There are stereotypical views about gay relationships, that they are promiscuous, and cannot form a abiding relationship. I am sure that they are no contrastive than clean relationships. We have promiscuous and lasting relationships. It sometimes human nature, especially among new-fashioned people who are not ready to settle down its not based on if you are gay or straight. So what is marriage for? Modern marriage is, of course, based upon traditions that religion helped to codify and enforce. But religious doctrine has no special standing in the world of temporal law and policy, the Christian nation crowd notwithstanding (Rauch, J 1997). If we take to know what and whom marriage is for in modern America, we need a level-headed secular doctrine. Many people believe that gays have a survival in being who they are, and it is only about sex. They can choose to be with a member of the opp osite sex if they want to be. Homosexually is based on mutual attraction, affection and love the same as heterosexuals. It is no varied than being white, black, or Chinese it is the way you are born. Gay marriage is morally wrong and violates the sanctified institution of marriage. This is said by the Bible. The United States and American law is supposed to be separate from the church this is from one of our founding fathers Thomas Jefferson. Therefore it is not right for someone to use the Bible to say what is to be made into law (Bidstrup 2009).. Gay couples are not morally able to raise children but, it is morally right for child molesters, murders, and convicted felons are allowed to marry and create and raise children. Why are the same people who oppose these rights to gay couples not against this, it happens every day. There are not studies that have determined that gay couples raising children caused them any impose on _or_ oppress, basin the same be said be said by child molester? Moral ReasoningGay marriage principles are, in my opinion, no different than those in a heterosexual marriage. They want the same thing in a marriage that anyone does that chooses a partner for life. Their values are the same, they are loyal to their partners, are monogamous. They participate in family life, committed to their neighborhoods and communities by making them a better place to live. They serve on their school boards, pop the question in the community, they are good citizens, just like their heterosexual counterparts, making their communities a better place to live (Bidstrup 2009). One of the benefits of the heterosexual society as well as the homosexual community for gay marriage is the participants are not involved in promiscuous sex. This slows down the deal of sexually transmitted diseases by the way know no sexual orientations. I am a supporter on gay marriage, I believe in all equal rights for all people no matter race, gender, or sexual preference. I believe in the withdrawal of Church and State. It should have no bearing on our laws and moral abstract thought when it comes to making our laws as long as our rights do not contradict on our fellow citizens rights. Most public officials place their hands on the Bible and swear to uphold the governing body. They dont put their hands on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible (Bond J., 2008). I think that religion and scripture are used to keep gay marriage from becoming legal. Our disposal uses religion when they think it is necessary for their advantage. That is wrong. The Bible was written long ago, there are so many contradictions in it and I believe that it was meant for the time it was written in and for a specific people. In our society today there are several injustices that are more important that our law makers should be concentrating on than opposing gay marriage. Let us move forward.ConsequencesWhen and if gay marriage is passed they will receive the same be nefits of heterosexual couples. They will enjoy the same contented lifestyle that a two income family has. In todays economic society it most often takes two incomes to keep up with the middle variance. The social benefits will be sharing insurance benefits, healthcare, tax income filing as a joint couple, joint ownership, and ability to make medical decisions for each other. Social Security, property inheritance, and family medical leave and military disability benefits are just a few more that heterosexual marriage couples have. The argument about homosexuals not being able to procreate, although part true, lesbian can certainly procreate by artificial insemination, and that they could harm children by raising them shows no scientific evidence. Gay marriage would development adoptions there are many children that are in need of homes by loving parents and extended families. This would be a positive step for children that do not have a home. One of the most successful approval s for gay marriage is that they will no longer be second class citizens by being on the lower part of the social standing. The homosexual community should no longer have to be denied their equal civil rights. We are all created equal and that includes everyone, it is not based on our sexual preference. If gay marriage is legalized they will no longer be subjected to narrow-mindedness every day. Bidstrup, S. 2009, Gay spousal, The Arguments and the Motives, Retrieved blemish 1, 2010. http//www.bidstrup.com/marriage.htm Bond, Julian. oppose Same-Sex Marriage Discriminates Against Gays. Opposing Viewpoints Discrimination. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints option Center. Gale. Baker College. 28 Feb. 2010Burns, K. 2005 Congregation for The Doctrine of The Faith. Gay Marriage Should Not Be Legal. At Issue Gay Marriage.. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Baker College. 28 Feb. 2010Kurtz, Stanley. Gay Marriage Threatens Families. At Issue Gay and Lesbian Families. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Baker College. 28 Feb. 2010Rauch, J., Society Has a Compelling Interest in Allowing Gay Marriage, Current Controversies Gay Rights, San Diego Greenhaven Press, 1997, Retrieved March 2, 2010, Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale, Baker College